Reflections on the inclusion of microfibres in the EU’s Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules, and what it means for science-based, flexible regulation. This piece responds to recent critiques of the proposed methodology and explores how evolving frameworks can support progress on microfibre pollution.

As momentum behind a global plastics treaty falters, this article argues that Canada still has a critical opportunity to lead—by addressing microfibre pollution at the national level.

In response to a federal court ruling that sided with industry challengers against listing plastics as “toxic” under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), this op-ed published in Ottawa Citizen defends the federal government’s decision to regulate plastics.